🔗 Share this article

Australia's decisive move to restrict social networking access for individuals under sixteen is creating waves worldwide. Officials, campaigners, and guardians are watching with great interest to see if this tactic will set a precedent for countries abroad.

The European Movement

Across Europe, a growing group of states are considering comparable measures.

• Denmark has announced a restriction on social media for under-15s, with the prime minister arguing that smartphones and apps are "taking away our youngsters' innocence". Legislation may be passed soon.
• The Norwegian government is preparing to introduce a age restriction of 15, citing the need to protect young people from the "manipulative force of the AI".
• The Irish government is working on a digital wallet to authenticate the user details of social media users. Authorities have suggested that an Australian-model ban remains "an measures in reserve".
• In The Spanish government, the prime minister has urged parliament to pass a proposal increasing the minimum age for joining social media to 16.
• In The French government, the head of state has proposed a ban for those under fifteen, and a government panel has recommended a similar action, including an overnight "screen time restriction" for adolescents.
• The government in the Netherlands has advised parents to restrict their youngsters from social media until 15.

At the EU level, the European parliament has approved a advisory statement demanding a ban for under-16s except if parental consent is given. Even though it warns of the "addictive" quality of these platforms, the step does not establish enforceable legislation.

"A strong age barrier is a solid foundation," stated a leading MEP behind the initiative.

Britain: A Cautious Stance

In the UK, the administration has not ruled out a potential ban, emphasizing that "nothing is off the table" but maintaining any decision must be "based on conclusive research".

Previously, interest grew behind a legislative effort to introduce limits on social media use by under-16s, but it was ultimately modified. Nonetheless, the administration committed to further research the matter.

Advocacy groups have raised apprehensions. A prominent charity set up by the family of a teenager who died after encountering disturbing social media material suggests that a simple age ban might not improve online safety and could lead to a "sudden drop-off" of exposure when users turn 16.

"This ban is a reaction to the inability of the tech sector to create products and services that are safe and suitable for young users," stated a leading child protection advocate.

The United States: A Fragmented Approach

Across America, regulation is largely unfolding at the local level due to country-wide stalemate.

• Utah demands guardian permission for those under 18 to use social media and controls overnight use.
• Florida has signed a measure banning those below 14 from joining social media, though it is subject to court battles.
• Virginia has approved a rule capping minors to a single hour of social media access per day, with extra use dependent on adult consent.
• The state of Georgia, Tennessee, and The state of Louisiana have likewise passed laws mandating adult authorization for under-16s to open social media profiles.

Even with cross-party agreement and proposals from various politicians to follow the Australian lead, a US-wide ban is currently seen as a distant prospect.

International Views

Outside of these regions, additional nations are similarly considering moves.

• Malaysia aims to prohibit social media for under-16s beginning next year.
• The Brazilian authorities has raised the required age for Instagram to 16.

However, international organizations adopt a more measured stance. The UN children's agency has warned that social media bans carry risks and "might have unintended consequences". The organization points out that social networks can be a "lifeline" for marginalized youth and that government action should not be a "substitute" for platform operators to prioritize user protection.

As this global discussion continues, the steps of this nation and its followers show that governments globally are no longer prepared to delay for tech companies to self-regulate.